In reply to SFrentier.

The city can always clean encampments. It follows the law and pretends it’s been stymied by the law as it suits. No law says folks are allowed to set up semi-permanent shanty towns on sidewalks. We have laws on the books against chop shops, too.

Encampments are coming back to the mission quickly- Folsom/17th/treat as one recent example. I thought that it was recently ruled that if the homeless refuse shelter offered by the city, that encampments can now (recently) be removed. So does this latest ruling reverse that? Meaning that encampments can again stay even if the homeless refuse available shelter? If so, we’re going backward again 🙁

Why no discussion of the harm to the city and its residents from these ghastly encampments and their resident drug addicts/insane people all over the city?

It is a 100% certainty that the Supreme Court reverses the Grants Pass decision. This injunction in SF should be vacated by June or shortly thereafter.

I want to know why Judge Ryu is not in jail. immediately after her initial ruling to support the injunction, Elon Musk unambiguously stated Judge Ryu must be thrown in jail. To date, she is still free to walk, and poop, on our city street. If government by and for billionaires means anything, the City or State must act immediately to jail Ryu.